Support to Public Prosecutors
State
vs. Salman Khan - Jodhpur, Rajasthan
State
vs. Ratiram Sharma and Others - Siliguri, West Bengal
State
vs. Ram Kumar and Sansar Chand - Haridwar, Uttaranchal
State
vs. Salman Khan - Jodhpur, Rajasthan
In 1998, Salman Khan,
a top “Bollywood” star, was arrested for
allegedly hunting protected black buck while filming
at Jodhpur in Rajasthan. The incident led to nation-wide
outrage and the authorities filed cases against the
film star.
Due to the high profile nature of the case, we asked
our lawyer to observe four cases - two filed by the
Police Department and one by the Forest Department against
Salman Khan, and one Forest Department case against
Narayan Prasad Nepalia, a veterinary surgeon who allegedly
falsified a post mortem report to exonerate the star.
Regrettably, most of the non-government witnesses,
including the drivers of the vehicles involved, have
turned hostile and changed their testimonies. As a result,
the testimony of government officials has become vitally
important, especially that of the Forest Department
officer who was in charge of the case when it was first
investigated.
The cases are still being heard in Jodhpur.
Top
State
vs. Ratiram Sharma and Others - Siliguri, West Bengal
In 1995, WPSI assisted in the arrest
of three people for trading in rhino horns near the
West Bengal town of Siliguri. A Taiwanese national among
those arrested was allegedly the main trader and had
promised to procure more horns.
WPSI’s lawyer has been attending case hearings
and liasing with the prosecution team. The case is important
to conservation efforts because a conviction would put
one of the largest suspected traders of illegal wildlife
goods in jail.
The case continues in Siliguri.
Top
State
vs. Ram Kumar and Sansar Chand - Haridwar, Uttaranchal
In 1995, the Forest Department of what
is now the State of Uttaranchal, then part of Uttar
Pradesh, arrested Ram Kumar with a leopard skin. On
interrogation, he revealed that he had procured the
skin for Sansar Chand, India’s most notorious
trader in illegal wildlife goods. Sansar’s New
Delhi house was raided and another skin was seized.
Consequently, he was named as a co-accused with Ram
Kumar and his presence is required in the Chief Judicial
Magistrate’s court, in Haridwar, Uttaranchal.
Sansar Chand has been named as the main buyer of wildlife
articles in numerous cases throughout India and was
convicted in a 1976 case. He was first arrested for
a wildlife case in 1974, when he was about sixteen years
old. There are now about eight cases pending against
him in the Delhi courts alone, all involving highly
endangered animals such as tigers and leopards. Skins
seized from his residence over the years include a large
number of protected species such as jackals, otters,
crocodiles and snakes. It is believed that Chand is
the mastermind of a large network of wildlife criminals,
and a conduit for transporting products to international
buyers.
The testimony of an ex-Ranger who was part of the original
raiding party is particularly important in the Uttaranchal
case. WPSI pays his bills for traveling from Meerut,
in the neighbouring state of Uttar Pradesh, to Haridwar
to give evidence (the government does not pay travel
allowances for attending court hearings, even to serving
officers).
In July 2003, the court issued a second non-bailable
warrant for Sansar Chand, who has so far not been arrested
in this case. WPSI wrote to the Commissioner and Joint
Commissioner of Police in Delhi asking them to ensure
that Sansar was produced in Haridwar. As a result, Sansar
Chand has to compulsorily attend hearings in Haridwar
or face another non-bailable warrant.
Top
|